Fair warning: this is going to be a long read. It's my blog and I'll be verbose if I want to, and I am known to fly off on tangents. Executive summary:
Here beginneth the tale. Warning: the tale is not yet done, and will be updated as the speakers are completed and auditioned. Currently speaker #1 of 2 is fully complete and is undergoing a gentle breakin period with a bit of the old Ludwig van.
My latest hobby project is building a pair of full range single driver loudspeakers. When I explain this project to friends and family, inevitably the question "and why exactly are you doing this?" comes up. My response generally includes the following points in no particular order:
I enjoy music, and I value high fidelity. I also believe that the commercial high fidelity audio industry generally extracts a very high margin from their customers, and price is only sometimes a signal for the level of quality: while I value high fidelity, I would never pay $5,000 for an amplifier or pair of speakers.
I believe in the hypothesis that just as high quality custom DIY electronics projects are now both very affordable and eminently do-able for the home hobbyist (e.g. Arduino, Raspberry Pi, etc. etc.), a hobbyist should also be able to build their own high fidelity audio components at home.
There are thriving communities on the internet where like-minded individuals share their knowledge and experience doing this kind of thing. I am interested in building something from scratch, from base components, but do not want to design it myself. I want to build something that has some level of grass roots community validation of its value proposition and quality. This blog post is a kind of thankful contribution back to the community, partly motivated by the hope that someone else can learn from my experience as I have from others'.
I am curious and intrigued by the following hypothesis: high fidelity DIY audio components may be built at home at a small fraction of what an equivalent commercial product would cost. With the subjective and personal nature of audio quality assessments, the only way to test this is to do it myself.
This project intersects with three distinct hobby interests: woodworking, electronics, and music. I have a decent home woodworking shop. Lately it has been used mostly for home maintenance and not really building interesting things from scratch. This project used most of my tools, including several that hadn't had an electron flowing through them for a few years.
I look forward to auditioning these speakers in blind A/B tests in the homes of my music loving friends. If the improvement from my current speakers is not evident I will reject the hypothesis. I hope to have my socks knocked off. Even if the speakers end up failing to deliver a superior experience with my current sources, they are a necessary first step towards my long term home audio vision which includes a DIY tube amp. And it has made for many pleasant hours of solitude in the workshop, which is its own reward.
I backed into doing a speaker project. This whole odyssey started with a desire to build a tube amp. Same motivations, different project. The problem is you usually need to have very high efficiency speakers for a tube amp. To do things in the proper order, it made sense to make speakers first. Speakers also have a wider application. If they are truly as awesome as I hope they will be, I'll proceed to replace all of the wall-mounted bookshelf speakers in my home theater with DIY speakers.
I want a design I can build myself, but I had no desire to design it myself...that would reek of hubris given my total lack of experience and knowledge of speaker design, something that became even more apparent as I started seeing the maze-like convolutions hidden in the interior of many speakers. Ideally I wanted something in the large bookshelf size range. As I dug into my research I ended up spending a lot of time on the diyAudio site, where I learned from proponents of a specific type of speaker design, the full range single driver loudspeaker. The simplicity of the design was appealing for a first timer like myself. And the idea that technology has advanced such that separate midrange, woofer, and tweeter drivers might be unnecessary and indeed come with a cost in the form of the crossover, which some argued had a deleterious impact on the resulting audio quality, seemed to fit into my whole hypothesis around the value of using simple high quality materials. A part of the thinking behind the hypothesis is that a craftsman can hand-tailor a project around materials of a much higher quality and with more attention to detail than a commercial manufacturer would use. It is the same ethos that drives me to hand build computers, selecting best of breed individual components and assembling them with the care that no manufacturer would ever devote to a product sold at retail. My hope is that a $100 driver available to a hobbyist might surpass the driver quality in a $1000 commercial product.
There were other reasons behind going full range single driver. If the low frequencies just aren't there to the degree I want, boom, I've got the motive for building a new DIY subwoofer. I'm also not too worried about the high frequency end of things, as a lifetime of occasional poor choices about environment and hearing protection (as well as age!) has rendered my body incapable of hearing frequencies beyond around 14k. Try some of the various test tones yourself, and do it together with a 10 year old to be humbled. Why spend money and introduce the unintended consequences of a tweeter and its accompanying crossover if I can't even hear what they produce? Because to hell with everyone else's ability to hear a cymbal ringing at 17k, this is all about ME!
I was thinking these speakers could live in our living room, where I have a couple of two driver bookshelf speakers I built from a speakerlab kit back in the 80's, and/or they could end up in the home theater where I currently have bookshelf speakers from Ascend Acoustics. You can tell I've always been a value conscious buyer. Someday I might see if I can build a sub to surpass the M&K in the home theater. Anyhoo, point being I initially saw this project as a bookshelf size.
At this point I maybe got carried away with the research and ended up gravitating to a driver that would push me to pretty much the far extreme of what anyone might call a bookshelf. The Fostex FF165WK. In hindsight maybe that was a mistake. Perhaps I was over-sold by the promise in the specs for this driver, stuff like "For the surface layer, the bincho charcoal powder is blended with a short-fibered (high freeness) kenaf, which allows to accelerate the propagation speed on the cone paper surface." It's all about the kenaf! OK I understand about as much of that as you do.
The increased size does open the possibility to just go without a supplemental subwoofer however. Some folks say I will be pleased and surprised by the bass extension.
My short list of plans were to build a Karlsonator 6, purchase a plan from Brines Acoustics, or build a mini Fonken design from David at planet_10 hifi. I can see how one can easily get sucked into analysis paralysis, and also how one could end up trying to build and compare all of these. I ended up going with a trapezoidal mini Fonken. I remain intrigued by the Karlsonator and curious how the complex trapezoidal mini Fonken would compare to the simpler classic golden ratio design.
I do have some regret still about the size. At almost 22" tall these are probably more appropriate on a stand than a bookshelf, and they very well may end up on stands. And if you are going to build a speaker that needs a stand, why not go whole hog and build a full size floorstanding Fonken for the benefit of more bass extension? Well that's hindsight for you.
One of the appealing aspects of the planet_10 hifi plans was that it uses a single sheet of 3/4" 5x5 Baltic birch plywood with little waste. It also neatly allows for getting the sheet cut twice at the lumber yard into three pieces 20" by 60", making transport a snap. I ended up making enough mistakes that a second sheet was required anyways. All of those bevels...I ended up gluing up one of the side assemblies with the inner side panel reversed. And then I cut the tops and bottoms just based on the plan drawings without accounting for the fact that I omitted the optional cosmetic cuts from the side panels.
I purchased the drivers and some terminal cups from Madisound.
The 1/2" high wool content felt was a challenge to find at a reasonable price. McMaster has it, but shipping is exorbitant. Gardico, a local industrial materials supplier just a few blocks from my home, is one of only two places on the west coast that actually stock the stuff. But at about $15 per square foot...ouch! The felt shouldn't cost more than the wood, or at least that was my pro-wood biased judgment. I ended up buying a 4x6 1/2" wool felt rug pad from rugpadusa.com. It arrived in a tight roll and I was disappointed with the actual thickness measuring about 3/8" of an inch. As it relaxed it did loft up a bit, but 1/2" is pushing it. At least the price was right.
For finishing I used Zinsser canned shellac, every one they've got: unwaxed SealCoat, Clear, Clear in an aerosol can, and Amber. I also used TransFast powdered mission dark brown aniline dye dissolved in alchohol, and a final treament with Behlen paste wax.
What fun to turn large pieces of wood into smaller ones and piles of sawdust and shavings.
This project calls for many unusual bevels. I am so glad I bought this little guy to nail the angles. Everything came together perfectly thanks to the precise cuts this enabled.
Always nice to get some hand planing in. I left the 9mm poplar vent spaces slightly proud and planed them flush. I'll sand out the table saw blade burn marks later.
Test fitting those complex bevels. You can see the vent spacers go all the way back because...I don't know! I am just following the plans...
The big glueup! It worked pretty well. The top ended up just slightly caddywampus which I corrected the best I could with a light touch from the belt sander. Other than that it is all square and tight. I tested the driver fit against the brace and then glued the top and bottom on. Some would screw the back on for any required maintenance or possibly adding more fill I guess, but I figure the driver hole will accommodate that need just fine. I left the top and bottom proud of the sided and trimmed with a flush trim bit with a bearing on the router table. Nice and clean!
I have a love/hate relationship with finishing. It is usually a humbling experience that leaves me concluding that either my skills have a long way to go, or I need to bite the bullet and get an HVLP spray rig. "Yet we all keep trying, like fools!"
Birch is a problematic wood. Kinda boring, not as pretty as maple, and prone to splotchiness when staining or dying if you don't seal it properly first. Many would just veneer this project with a more reasonable wood like cherry, walnut, oak, padauk, zebrawood, ebony etc. Not me, I decided I would honor the integrity of the materials in the true spirit of the arts and crafts movement, or some such BS. This project is about function not form! I did some test panels and solicited input from my design focus group (also known as the wife) to settle on a relatively dark brown mission dye with shellac top coats.
I enjoy working with shellac. It is non-toxic, dries very fast, and looks nice. It isn't the most durable finish, but it is definitely a classic look.
I am not happy with how the finishing has gone so far. I think I've managed to salvage things, but boy howdy did I make some mistakes. See the lessons learned section for more on how I would do this again...which I will need to do on speaker #2 and my god will it be a challenge to make it match the contortions this speaker has gone through on the finishing table!
Here we are with three coats of 1 lb cut unwaxed clear SealCoat shellac. Looking good! I brushed it on with a china bristle brush and it went pretty darn well. Too bad it would all be for naught as I ended up stripping all of it off after making some unrecoverable errors.
At this point I made up the test panels and decided to use the TransFast dark mission brown dye. I considered going pure shellac, no dye, which I was definitely confident in my ability to execute. Feedback from the focus group was that clear shellac was "too Ikea" (agreed) and amber was too orange. So the mission dark brown dye it was to be. I bought this stuff a long time ago, and I guess since then they've ceased recommending dissolving it in alcohol due to so many problems. I have a tendency to want to use stuff just because I have it in my cabinet, sometimes when that's not really the best decision. My economics training tells me I should approach things more rationally, considering the $10 I spent on that dye 15 years ago as a sunk cost irrelevant at the margin of today's decision. Throwing rational thought to the wind, I vowed I would get my money's worth out of that $10 expenditure and use the dye I have on hand! Anyways, this stuff was tough to work with in combination with the alcohol-based shellac. You have to really nail laying it down smoothly and evenly. There really is no fixing little uneven areas later with any touchups or blending. I tried and ended up just dissolving through the layers and making matters worse, ultimately ending up with a little patch of completely bare wood that would never match its surroundings. I learned this the hard way and stripping the whole thing down to bare wood and starting over. That was frustrating, but don't we all learn best from the experience of our own personal mistakes? The only saving grace was that since it was all alcohol-based, with about 8 ounces of DNA and a bunch of paper towels I got the whole thing back to bare wood in about 15 minutes.
When I put it all back on for the second time, I did my best to get it looking as perfect as I could while it was still wet. Get it right, and then try not to screw it up as I apply the shellac. I padded the dye on just like you would pad shellac on. It went pretty well this time. Not perfect, but good. A little uneven in tone in some places, but definitely without the problem spots I tried and failed to rub and blend out on attempt #1.
My troubleshooting research gave me a tip: seal off the dye coat with a series of light coats of clear shellac from an aerosol can. Yes! A solution! Well I ended up screwing that up too, getting too eager and laying the first coat on too thick. Imagine my horror as I see it dissolving the dye into little spots right before my eyes! I ended up stripping the front panel for a second time to correct this, but the sides and top were not impacted quite so badly and I left them. Time to move on. Fortunately, the subsequent shellac coats evened out some of the lifting/pooling of the dye. I could see the dye coming off on the shellac pad, so it wasn't totally sealed off, maybe for the best.
I started shifting my background conversation to a narrative about how this will be a one of a kind piece with a lot of character...maybe not something to go in a museum but a true original beauty. There are certainly less generous ways to describe it while simultaneously pointing out improvements required in the application technique, but what's done is done and better to look on the bright side. As the creator, sadly I can only see the defects. To the uninitiated it probably looks fine.
Above is how it looked after a few coats of amber shellac. I ended up with 4 coats of amber.
Above is building up the clear coats. It is getting pretty dark and glossy. I can see my reflection in it.
I'm glad I shifted from my initial plan of brushing the shellac on to using a pad instead. I aspire to be much better at brushing on both shellac and varnish than I presently am. I have a boat and while it has been updated to minimize the brightwork maintenance requirements, there is enough still there that I've had to get pretty comfortable working with varnish. That is a pain compared to shellac -- shellac lets you recoat in one hour and it doesn't matter too much if you go longer. With varnish, you have to hit it again in 12 hours, every 12 hours. I've got some nice brushes, including high quality natural bristle brushes, with separate brushes dedicated just to varnish vs. shellac. And I've got a brush comb and a spinner. Point is, I want to be a smooth-brushing craftsman but I'm not as facile with a brush as I am with a pad, at least right now. I always end up with some lap marks or other visible variations with a brush. I'm very satisfied with the quality of my pad application, so I set aside the $40 brushes and reverted to a simple pad made of 25 cents worth of rags. I charge the pad while I am using it with shellac in a 4 oz squeeze bottle. I can get a full pass, recharge, and another full pass before it starts dragging and I move on. No drips or runs ever, and with good raking light source you can easily control coverage quality.
Here is the full finish regimen:
And that's where things stand today! The speaker is plugged in and undergoing its breakin period. After 50 hours or so I'll test it out at higher volume levels. More updates will come as I build speaker #2 which will hopefully go faster, and perform some exacting but totally subjective evaluations. But it will be October soon and I must shift gears to getting my DIY robotic Halloween props ready, so that might slow down speaker construction. Patience, grasshoppers.
I built the speakers one at a time so I could apply any lessons learned while building the second one. Once I got into the finishing stage I realized this will make it a bit of a challenge to match their appearance. As a mitigation against this risk I kept notes of the exact finishing steps.
I think I would try the allegedly higher quality Apply Ply next time. With the exposed end grain, any defects or variations in the plys inside the plywood are visually distracting. Or veneer it I guess. I was interested to discover in my plywood research that Apple Ply has nothing to do with the apple wood species. It is manufactured in America as a domestic alternative to cheap imported Russian or Baltic birch. The naming is supposed to evoke a jingoistic patriotic response as this plywood is as American as apple pie. Apple pie. Apple ply. Get it? Har. Strange but true.
The magnetic digital blade angle measurement doohicky I bought was invaluable for achieving consistent and precise bevel cuts on the table saw.
Cut the backs and top/bottom slightly oversize. Trim them flush with the router and a flush trim bit. This gives you a little wiggle room during glueup. I used this as an excuse to buy a new Whiteside solid carbide downcut double bearing flush trim bit. Arggh!
Glue up the sides first. Glue up the vent spacers slightly proud of the plywood. Hand plane flush after they dry.
I glued up the side assemblies, front, back, and brace as one assembly. Then I fine tuned the brace to driver fit and glued on the top and bottom last. I would do it this way again.
Would I use the same finish protocol? Yes...I do like the results, and I always enjoy working with shellac, but I would only do it again with some hard earned knowledge of how to manage a dye in alcohol solvent layered with shellac, also in alcohol of course. You absolutely can't work over or rub hard any trouble areas or you will dissolve right through everything to the bare wood again. I found padding the dye on, just as I pad on shellac, with smooth decisive strokes, gave the best results. If there are lap marks or any other irregularities, do your best to work them out while keeping it all wet. After the dye dried I sprayed it with many...maybe 8...extremely light coats of aerosol spray clear shellac. This is the part I messed up: it is very easy to put too much on and it will dissolve the dye in odd spotty patterns. I did bare mistings, which dried in minutes allowing many coats in a few hours. And of course one of the silver linings to making any mistakes with this regimen is that a good sloshing and wiping of denatured alcohol will take any mistakes back to bare wood in a matter of minutes, so if you aren't happy with it you can get a do-over.
As I mentioned way up at the top of this post, I'm not done! Come back for updates as I build speaker #2 and evaluate the results.Current rating: 3.1 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook